One of the things that did not draw much notice in the announcement of the Warren-McCain-Obama confab is the fact that the presidential interviews will be conducted under the auspices of the Saddleback Civil Forum (in partnership with the multi-faith group, Faith in Public Life), not under the auspices of Warren's church.
In his press release, Warren distinguishes between his job as a Christian minister and his administration of the Saddleback Civil Forum. Warren says his "primary calling" is as a Christian minister who "proclaim[s] the Gospel Truth of salvation in Jesus Christ," but he notes that the Saddleback Civil Forum "was established to promote civil discourse and the common good of all." The release also says that, "[i]n conjunction with the Civil Forum event, Warren will convene an interfaith meeting at the church for approximately 30 Christian, Jewish and Muslim leaders to discuss cooperation in projects for the common good of all Americans."
By setting up an entity that is separate from the church (the Saddleback Civil Forum), and making the distinction between the purpose of the two entities and his two roles explicit, Warren draws some helpful lines. For example, he demonstrates that there are distinctions between the religious and the civic spheres, and that it is important to recognize those distinctions in substantive and symbolic ways. Warren also demonstrates that a person certainly does not abandon or diminish his or her faith when he or she commits to civil discourse across deep differences, recognizes and respects the equality of all people as citizens, and works hand-in-hand with people of different faiths to promote the common good of all Americans. Further, by partnering with the multi-faith group, Faith in Public Life, on the event, and saying that he will "devise his questions with input from the Muslim, Jewish and Christian leaders associated with the group," Warren sends some important signals about how this event will differ from a church event.
In the days ahead, I hope Rick Warren will expound on these distinctions and also make it clear that people who don't claim a faith are valuable and equal partners in the promotion of the common good. Too often, the message is sent (intentionally or unintentionally) that only certain religious people have values or that only religious people have values. Not true. In my view, religious leaders need to go out of their way to make this clear, and Warren has a great national platform to do so.
Indeed, Warren holds in his hands a tremendous opportunity -- the chance to interview the two candidates for president of the United States in their only scheduled joint appearance before their respective party conventions. Consistent with his commitment to serve the common good in this role, Warren should take care to ensure that his stewardship of this important event fully reflects the distinctions he has described and honors and benefits Americans of all faiths and none.